Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Arda Tarwa's avatar

Working or succeeding with men is ridiculously easy. They are object-oriented. That means they focus on the work, almost exclusively. If the Work is succeeding, they won't care if it's a "Good" person or a "Bad" person, or the person did something wrong once we can hold over them. They won't care if you're a man or a woman, so they immediately cede half the field, while being work oriented means the majority of men have a bias to stay put in the competency of their present task. Being promoted would mean they would have more human interactions, which they are not likely to prefer, being work and object-oriented.

Now here's your problem: if men are work oriented and women are different, then .... women are what? In some shape or manner, not "work" oriented, not "task" oriented, not "success" oriented. They are relationship-oriented. It's okay for the project to fail and the company to lose money if the right friends prosper and the right people are happy. Disney is a high-profile example right now among hundreds, losing billions with one debacle after another, not the slightest impulse to change. The companies will, ultimately, cease to exist on this basis, because, physics. I'm not sure the opposite is true, but let's change venues and point out if man's "object orienting" were the primary approach in family and society, everyone might be fed...but they wouldn't know why they should be, and that would be an equal-scale failure.

Expand full comment
Clare Ashcraft's avatar

I would love to read that essay about being in a female dominated field with a analytical brain

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts