The limits of DEI #2: responses to critics
Last week, we explored how diversity, equity, and inclusion programs often obscure the abuse of power by granting people moral licenses based on their identities.
The limits of DEI: anyone can abuse their power, not just white men
DEI frameworks oversimplify workplace power dynamics by creating false binaries between oppressor and oppressed groups, leading to moral licensing that can enable discriminatory behavior from any identity group.
A critique from the right
took issue with my partial defense of the goals of DEI from the right. I did appreciate being addressed in the same breath as Richard Reeves.Much of it is the author dunking on the version of me from a decade ago. I’ll ignore that because my skin is thicker now, but I want to underscore that insulting people when they admit they were once wrong is in poor taste. The entire premise of my original post is how I understood the problems with DEI through my contradictory experiences. Here’s the substance:
My critique is not that Radha has no good points to make, it’s that she:
Wants to make DEI do what it says it does (an impossibility) instead of realizing that it would be easier to change the name of it to Anti-White People and Straight Men Department than to make it precipitate any form of justice.
Thinks…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Radically Pragmatic to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.



